BoldTruth.com clearly shows that the Congressional Apportionment Amendment (CAA) from the Bill of Rights is Ratified. In fact, all 12 of the original articles or amendments in the Bill of Rights are ratified. It's time Congress starts following them. Not 10 amendments, 12 amendments. One of those amendments clearly states we should have One Representative for every 50,000 people per district, per state, in the United States seated in the House of Representatives. Share with your friends that love American and the Constitution. Support Eugene M. LaVergne v. Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary of Commerce, et al., No. 12-778

The Mirror site for NationalTruth.org

Share
 

Home - The Proof and Case - News from Bold Truth - Why 6000+ Representatives? - Oliver Ellsworth's Correction Letter

What is the Congressional Apportionment Amendment (CAA) and can you prove it's ratified?


We bet you didn't know there was a ratified Congressional Apportionment Amendment (Article the First) of the Bill  of Rights. THE WHAT? The Congressional Apportionment Amendment or Article the First of the Bill of Rights is the first of the 12 amendments the colonies voted on when our "more perfect union" was formed. We'd like to show you an interesting historical fact. That the Congressional Apportionment Amendment or Article the First of the Bill of Rights was ratified by a vote of 78.6% and then 80% of the states by 1792 when Kentucky voted to accept the Bill of Rights and become our 15th state.  

With the ratification of the Bill of Rights by Kentucky and the discovery in Connecticut's archives in 2011 that Connecticut voted "Yes" to this amendment in 1790, (We are told historically that they voted no for some reason*), caused this amendment to automatically become constitutional law regardless of the states notifying Congress of their votes. The Archivist of the United States and Congress now needs to accept the fact that this is a ratified amendment. It's up to you to make sure it's placed in our Constitution by demanding that Archivist of the United States, David Ferriero do his job and accept as ratified, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment.  The Congressional Apportionment Amendment says we should have One Representative in the House for every 50,000 People once the country reached 8,000,000 people. 

Interesting point: Why should one elected Representative in the House represent 1 million peoples votes and another represent 500,000 peoples votes? Quite simply, they shouldn't.  Your voice and votes were diluted when Congress voted to lock the House of Representatives at 435 members in 1911. The ratified Congressional Apportionment Amendment isn't being followed, but this was one of the reasons it was created. To always give a voice to the People on a level field for all people. We can fix that. We want to put the country back on track for fair representation and do it constitutionally. No new amendment is needed. The states already voted yes for this amendment. It's been done. One man stands in your way.

The Archivist of the United States is David Ferriero. It is his job to accept this amendment once he knows it is ratified. He found out in 2011. There is talk on the Belt that David Ferriero is considering accepting this amendment as ratified and making it our 28th amendment. We stand up for Don Wilson.  In 1992, Don Wilson, then the Archivist did his job when it was found that Article the 2nd from the Bill of Rights (and commonly called the Watson Amendment) had enough states voting YES to be ratified. David Ferriero has been served in many lawsuits requesting he do his oath of office. Since David Ferriero has refused up to this point, (Not like the honorable Don Wilson), we requested that the Supreme Court do it for him. The Supreme Court has declined that offer saying it's a political matter. Take a read in our lawsuit for all the proof you need to show we have a ratified amendment, why the Government of the United States has agreed that we have a ratified amendment, but says this is the Job of the Archivist of the United States to accept. Since David Ferriero is the Archivist, David Ferriero needs to do his job. Mr. Ferriero has a twitter account at https://twitter.com/dferriero. Lets all tweet to him and ask him when he'll be accepting the CAA know that he knows enough states have ratified it into Constitutional history.

Eugene M. LaVergne v. Rebecca Blank, Acting Secretary of Commerce, et al., No. 12-778 is our PDF filing for the Federal Lawsuit to have the Apportionment Amendment recognized by the Supreme Court as Constitutional Law and require Congress to start seating the correct number of Congressmen and Women from each state. This lawsuit was filed with the Supreme Court in December 2012, after being denied a review in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals on "Political Grounds" and was again denied without comment on 02/15/13 by the Supreme Court. Denying a suit without comment isn't the same as saying it's wrong. It's like saying "I take the Fifth". The suit clearly outlines all the proof you need.  There are other options and we are working on them. Read our News section for updates.

You'll have to educate yourself and see why we are correct in what we are presenting to you. See below for the first four articles of the Bill of Rights as voted on by the states. All are now passed. You'll notice Article the 3rd is the Free Speech amendment and isn't the first of the amendments to be voted on. It doesn't make it any less important but it corrects a common historical inaccuracy that we only had 10 amendments in the Bill of Rights.

 

*Historical Note: Oliver Ellsworth, and Roger Sherman, were the Connecticut delegates to the Constitutional Convention with William Samuel Johnson. Ellsworth and Sherman slaved over the Congressional Apportionment Amendment. It was their work of art in the Bill of Rights, so important, it was labeled as "Article the First" and to make sure that you always had fair and honest representation and never let the House of Representatives get taken over by special interest groups. Do you really think Connecticut's assemblies voted no for this when the people that created it were the leaders from Connecticut. In fact, they did vote Yes for this amendment and because they voted yes, that took the amendment over the 75% threshold needed for ratification. Kentucky brings it up to 80%. Why we are told they voted no is a different story but it is a story we now find false. Now that you know it's false, the Congressional Apportionment Amendment needs to be accepted as ratified and followed as our 28th Amendment to the Constitution.


You can make a change for the better.

Copyright 2012-2013 - BoldTruth.com and NationalTruth.org - Site run by Recordweb Communications LLC. - Contact information: email Sneuman@recordweb.com with questions, concerns and interviews with Constitutional Expert Eugene Martin LaVergne.